Mountaintop mining bill falters in TN Senate

10:26 AM, Mar 21, 2013   |    comments
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • - A A A +

By Chas Sisk, The Tennessean

A bill that would have restricted surface mining at high elevations was killed for the year Wednesday in the Tennessee Senate.

Legislation meant to prevent new "mountaintop removal" mining projects in Tennessee failed in the Senate Energy, Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee when members declined to take up the measure. The decision snuffed out any debate on the bill, despite a plea from its sponsor to hold a hearing on the measure.

"I was hoping for at least a discussion," said state Sen. Lowe Finney, D-Jackson. "If they're not for it, that's one thing. ... I think the committee should have at least taken it up and studied it."

Senate Bill 99 would have denied water permits for new mining projects that disturb ridgelines higher than 2,000 feet. Existing mines would have been able to continue under their current permits, as well as mines that use underground mining techniques, supporters said.

There was little chance the bill would clear the state legislature, which has rejected such measures repeatedly in the past. But witnesses for both sides were on hand to debate the bill, if necessary.

About 30 people wearing hard hats, work jackets and black shirts with pro-coal slogans filled three rows at the front of the hearing room. Committee members - six Republicans and one Democrat - welcomed them warmly at the start of the meeting.

"This bill was an attempt to do away with coal mining in Tennessee," said Chuck Laine, president of the Tennessee Mining Association. "It didn't do anything to timber, windmills, cellphone towers. Nothing else was included but coal, because this was an attempt to do away with coal."

High-elevation surface mining does take place in Tennessee, though supporters and opponents of the bill differ on whether this constitutes "mountaintop removal."

Foes of the legislation say coal companies use techniques in Tennessee that are less disruptive to ridgelines than those employed in other states, such as West Virginia. But environmental groups and others say these techniques also spoil scenic vistas and pollute groundwater in the valleys below.

Finney said he plans to try again next year.